AIaaS and Market Manipulation: Opportunities for Growth and the Need for Regulation in India

I. Introduction

The advent of Artificial Intelligence as a Service (AIaaS) has revolutionized various sectors, notably the market industry. By offering scalable, flexible, and cost-effective AI solutions, AIaaS enables businesses to harness the power of artificial intelligence without the need for substantial in-house infrastructure or expertise². This research paper delves into the multifaceted impacts of AIaaS on the market, with a particular focus on the phenomenon of market manipulation. The paper is structured into five comprehensive sections. The first section explores the utility of AIaaS in the market, highlighting how market players leverage AI to enhance their operational efficiency, predictive accuracy, and ultimately, their market standing. This section provides insights into the strategic integration of AI technologies by businesses aiming to optimize their market performance and gain competitive advantages.

In the second section, the paper examines the potential risks associated with the implementation of AIaaS, with a primary focus on market manipulation. Market manipulation, a pressing contemporary issue, involves the use of AI algorithms to distort market conditions for illicit gains. This section scrutinizes how AIaaS can be exploited to manipulate markets, thereby posing significant risks to market integrity and fairness. The third section addresses the emerging risks related to the automation of artificial intelligence, driven by its machine learning capabilities. As AI systems become increasingly autonomous, the potential for unintended consequences and systemic risks escalates. This section discusses the challenges posed by the self-learning nature of AI, which can lead to unpredictable and potentially harmful market behaviours. In the fourth section, the paper underscores the necessity for regulatory evolution in India concerning AIaaS and its market impact. By comparing domestic regulatory frameworks with those of Europe, this section highlights the gaps and suggests improvements in India's regulatory approach. The analysis emphasizes the need for robust regulations to mitigate the risks of market manipulation and ensure the ethical deployment of AIaaS.

The fifth and final section concludes the paper, synthesizing the key findings and reiterating the critical need for a balanced approach that fosters innovation while safeguarding market integrity. This paper will enhance the understanding of the potential risks associated with the autonomous AI decision making. There is a need for regulatory paradigm shift favouring increased adaptability to the challenges posed by a continually evolving technological finance market.

II. Utility of artificial intelligence as a service in the market

Artificial Intelligence as a Service (AIaaS) represents a transformative model where third-party vendors offer AI-powered tools and capabilities to businesses, enabling them to integrate sophisticated AI solutions into their systems without the need for extensive in-house development³. This approach is both low-risk and cost-effective, allowing businesses to deploy AI technologies without the substantial investment required to develop AI from scratch. AIaaS leverages machine learning algorithms to provide businesses with advanced data analysis and insights in a short span of time⁴. However, the effectiveness of these insights heavily depends on the quality and authenticity of the data fed into the AI systems.

AIaaS offers tailored solutions to specific business problems and generates statistical forecasts that can significantly enhance business models. According to various sources, AIaaS is typically provided in four primary forms: Bots and virtual assistants, Machine Learning Frameworks, Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), and AI of Things (AIoT), where AI is integrated into the Internet of Things (IoT)⁵. These services utilize deep learning, machine learning algorithms, and natural language processing to understand human interactions and deliver increasingly personalized experiences over time. Employing AIaaS in business models presents numerous benefits. It saves time and boosts team productivity by automating complex tasks and providing rapid data analysis. This cost-effectiveness is further enhanced as AIaaS can handle workloads that would typically require numerous research analysts. Moreover, AIaaS helps businesses scale faster by addressing practical market issues, such as optimizing supply chains, enhancing customer service, and improving decision-making processes⁶. For example, many modern businesses use AIaaS to manage customer inquiries, providing swift and accurate responses to common questions, thereby enhancing user experience.

Despite its numerous advantages, the integration of AIaaS into business models also presents significant risks. These risks, which will be discussed in detail in the next section, include potential threats to market integrity. The reliance on AI-driven decisions can lead to unintended consequences if the AI systems are not properly monitored and regulated. Additionally, the deployment of AIaaS raises concerns about data security and privacy, as sensitive information is often handled by third-party providers. AIaaS offers a myriad of benefits that make it an attractive option for businesses looking to harness the power of artificial intelligence without the associated high costs and risks of in-house development. It enhances efficiency, productivity, and scalability, providing businesses with a competitive edge in the market. However, the potential risks associated with AIaaS, such as data authenticity, security, and long-term market integrity, must be carefully managed to ensure the sustainable and ethical use of AI technologies. The following section will delve into these risks in greater detail, exploring the complexities and challenges of implementing AIaaS in the market.

III. Darker side of aiaas: market manipulation

Market manipulation refers to deliberate actions taken to deceive or distort market conditions to achieve illicit gains⁷. With the advent of Artificial Intelligence as a Service (AIaaS), the potential for such manipulations has significantly increased. AIaaS, offered by third-party vendors such as Amazon Web Services, Google AI, Microsoft Azure AI, and OpenAI, allows businesses to incorporate advanced AI-powered tools into their systems⁸. While AIaaS provides numerous benefits, including cost-effective and scalable AI solutions, it also presents substantial risks if not used properly. The primary risk associated with AIaaS is the reliance on biased and unreliable data. Despite the sophisticated machine learning capacities of AI systems, their effectiveness can be severely compromised if they are fed false or misleading data. This can result in inaccurate forecasts and analyses, which, when applied to market strategies, can lead to significant financial losses. The integrity of the data is paramount; any flaws in the input can propagate through the AI model, producing skewed outputs that misinform business decisions⁹.

Another critical risk is data privacy. In the AIaaS model, businesses typically store their data in the cloud, which involves using a network of servers accessible over the internet. While this allows for flexibility and scalability, it also makes the data vulnerable to breaches¹⁰. If sensitive business data is compromised, it can fall into the hands of competitors, leading to market manipulation. Competitors with access to proprietary data can distort market functioning by implementing strategies that unfairly advantage them, undermining the principles of a fair and transparent market. AIaaS providers tailor their services to fit specific business models, requiring businesses to train the AI model with data relevant to their strategies. For example, a company "Y" using services from a provider "X" must ensure that it aligns with their business goals and operations. However, storing this data in the cloud introduces the risk of data breaches. A breach could expose sensitive business strategies to competitors, facilitating market manipulation. Competitors could use this information to anticipate and counteract the strategies of company "Y," thereby manipulating market conditions to their advantage. The projected market value of artificial intelligence in marketing worldwide (see Graph 1)¹¹ underscores the urgent need for attention towards market manipulation, highlighting the necessity for robust regulations in India to address the issues associated with AIaaS and ensure fair market practices.

Graph 1

Market manipulation through AI can manifest in various ways. AI systems can analyse vast amounts of data to identify patterns and trends that human analysts might miss. This capability can be used to create false signals in the market, tricking other market participants into buying or selling based on deceptive information. For instance, AI-driven trading algorithms can execute large volumes of trades to create artificial price movements, prompting other traders to react. This can lead to a cascading effect, where the initial false movement is amplified by subsequent trades, resulting in significant market disruptions¹². Moreover, AIaaS can be used to manipulate consumer behaviour. By analysing consumer data, AI systems can tailor marketing strategies to exploit psychological triggers, influencing purchasing decisions. This can lead to consumers making choices that they might not have otherwise made, based on manipulated information. For example, an AI system might identify that certain consumers are more likely to buy a product if they believe it is scarce. The business could then create an artificial sense of scarcity, prompting consumers to buy the product out of fear of missing out.

The potential for AIaaS to be used for market manipulation has not gone unnoticed by regulatory bodies. Various regulators worldwide are implementing AI models to detect and combat market manipulation. These AI systems monitor trading patterns and behaviours to identify suspicious activities that might indicate manipulation. However, this creates a technological "arms race" between regulators and bad actors, with both sides continually advancing their AI capabilities to outmanoeuvre the other¹³.

IV. The risk of autonomy in aiaas and market manipulation

Artificial Intelligence as a Service (AIaaS) has revolutionized the business landscape, offering advanced capabilities through sophisticated AI models. Initially, these AI models are trained to perform functions by feeding them with relevant data, often under human supervision. However, recent studies have highlighted a significant shift in AI capabilities. Research has demonstrated that AI models, after mastering a series of basic tasks, can autonomously create connections with other AI models—referred to as 'sister AI'—without human intervention. A notable example is a team of researchers who succeeded in modelling an artificial neural network capable of such cognitive prowess, illustrating the autonomous evolution of AI¹⁴. The ability of two AI systems to interact independently poses profound risks, particularly in the realm of data privacy and market manipulation. If AI models can communicate and share information without human oversight, the potential for data breaches escalates dramatically. AIaaS platforms could autonomously manipulate market conditions, creating an environment where market manipulations occur without the knowledge or control of their human creators¹⁵. This underscores the urgent need to regulate AI activities to mitigate the risks associated with such autonomous behaviours.

For instance, AI-driven trading algorithms can create artificial price movements, prompting consumers to buy or sell assets under false pretences. By the time the manipulation is uncovered, significant financial harm may have already been done, potentially leading to market instability or collapse. One recent example that underscores these risks involved the use of AI in high-frequency trading (HFT). In 2020, an AI-driven trading system was found to have manipulated stock prices by executing a series of rapid trades that created the illusion of market demand¹⁶. This deception led other traders to react, causing a ripple effect that distorted the market prices significantly. Although regulatory bodies eventually identified and penalized the responsible parties, the incident highlighted how AI systems could autonomously engage in market manipulation without immediate human detection. Another example is the Cambridge Analytica scandal¹⁷, which, although primarily a data privacy issue, illustrated the potential for AI-driven systems to manipulate public opinion and market behaviour¹⁸. AI algorithms were used to analyse vast amounts of user data to influence political campaigns and voter behaviour. This manipulation of information flows without user consent demonstrated how AI could be used to affect decision-making processes on a large scale, with profound implications for market integrity and consumer trust.

Furthermore, the ability of AI systems to evolve and learn from their interactions increases the complexity of regulating their activities. Traditional regulatory frameworks may be ill-equipped to handle the dynamic and autonomous nature of AI. This necessitates the development of advanced regulatory approaches that can monitor and manage AI activities in real-time. Regulatory bodies must invest in AI technologies themselves to keep pace with the rapid advancements in AI capabilities and to effectively detect and prevent manipulative practices¹⁹. The risks associated with the autonomy of AIaaS extend beyond market manipulation and consumer impact. Autonomous AI systems could potentially engage in behaviours that are detrimental to market stability and fairness, such as creating monopolistic conditions or facilitating unfair competitive advantages. For instance, an AI system could be programmed to identify and exploit regulatory loopholes, thereby undermining the regulatory framework designed to ensure fair market practices. Given these risks, it is imperative to shift our focus towards regulating AI activities and mitigating the risks of market manipulation associated with AI. Policymakers, industry stakeholders, and regulatory bodies must collaborate to develop comprehensive regulations that address the unique challenges posed by autonomous AI systems²⁰. These regulations should encompass data privacy, ethical use of AI, real-time monitoring, and enforcement mechanisms to ensure that AI is used responsibly and transparently.

V. Need for regulatory changes with respect to market manipulation and aiaas

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence as a Service (AIaaS) has introduced unprecedented capabilities and efficiencies for businesses. However, these advancements also bring significant risks, particularly concerning market manipulation and data privacy²¹. The autonomous nature of AI systems, coupled with the ability to process and analyse vast amounts of data, presents unique challenges that current regulatory frameworks are ill-equipped to address. There is an urgent need for comprehensive regulatory changes to mitigate these risks and ensure the ethical deployment of AIaaS.

Data privacy concerns are paramount in the implementation of AIaaS by business models. AI systems rely heavily on data to function effectively, and this data is often stored in the cloud, making it susceptible to breaches. If sensitive business data is accessed by unauthorized parties, it can lead to market manipulation²². Competitors can exploit leaked data to gain unfair advantages, distorting market conditions and undermining fair competition. Moreover, the autonomous capabilities of AI systems mean they can potentially engage in manipulative practices without human intervention, complicating accountability and liability.

The Indian legal system currently has significant gaps concerning AIaaS and market manipulation. One glaring issue is the ambiguity around liability in cases where market manipulation is carried out autonomously by AI systems. Existing laws do not clearly define who would be held responsible if an AI system, without human intervention, manipulates the market. Would the AIaaS provider be liable, or would the liability fall on the business using the AI system? This legal gray area needs urgent attention to prevent exploitation by bad actors and to provide clear guidelines for accountability²³.

In contrast, the European Union has recently legislated robust anti-manipulation laws that explicitly address the role of artificial intelligence. The European Market Abuse Regulation (MAR)²⁴ has been updated to include provisions that tackle the use of AI in market manipulation. These laws mandate that AI systems must be transparent, auditable, and subject to strict compliance standards. They also require that AIaaS providers implement measures to prevent manipulative practices and ensure data integrity²⁵. The European approach provides a comprehensive framework that could serve as a model for India.

India can benefit from legislating similar laws that address the specific challenges posed by AIaaS. Key features of such laws should include:

1. Clear Liability Provisions: Define accountability for market manipulation conducted by AI systems, whether through human intervention or autonomously.

2. Transparency Requirements: Mandate that AI systems used in trading and market analysis are transparent and their decision-making processes are auditable.

3. Data Privacy Safeguards: Strengthen data privacy laws to protect sensitive business information from breaches and misuse.

4. Ethical AI Usage: Establish guidelines for the ethical use of AI, ensuring that AI systems are used to enhance market fairness and integrity rather than undermine it.

5. Regulatory Oversight: Create specialized regulatory bodies equipped with the expertise to monitor and manage the use of AI in financial markets.

The risk of data privacy in AIaaS is substantial and plays a crucial role in market manipulation. Inadequate data protection can lead to significant breaches, giving malicious actors the information they need to distort market conditions²⁶. Comparatively, the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is one of the strongest data privacy laws globally, providing stringent protections for personal and business data²⁷. The GDPR requires businesses to implement robust data protection measures and imposes heavy penalties for breaches. In contrast, Indian data privacy laws, such as the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, are less comprehensive and lack the same level of enforcement and protection.

For India to effectively address the challenges posed by AIaaS and market manipulation, key changes are needed in its legal framework:

1. Enhanced Data Privacy Regulations: Align data privacy laws with GDPR standards to ensure rigorous protection of sensitive information.

2. Specific AI Regulations: Develop laws specifically targeting AI usage in financial markets, ensuring transparency, accountability, and ethical standards.

3. Liability Clarity: Define clear liability rules for market manipulation conducted by AI, including cases of autonomous actions by AI systems.

4. Regulatory Capacity Building: Invest in building the capacity of regulatory bodies to oversee and manage the complex dynamics of AI-driven markets.

The integration of AIaaS into business models brings immense potential but also significant risks. The autonomous capabilities of AI, combined with data privacy vulnerabilities, create opportunities for market manipulation that current Indian laws are not equipped to handle²⁸. This proactive approach is essential to harness the benefits of AI while safeguarding against its potential to disrupt and manipulate markets.

VI. Conclusion

The advent of Artificial Intelligence as a Service (AIaaS) presents unprecedented opportunities for businesses, offering cost-effective, scalable, and sophisticated AI solutions. However, the autonomous capabilities of AI systems pose significant risks, particularly concerning data privacy and market manipulation. The current Indian legal framework lacks the necessary provisions to address these challenges, leaving gaps in accountability and regulation²⁹. The recent advancements in AI, such as AI models interacting without human intervention, further exacerbate these risks, making it imperative to establish robust regulatory measures. Learning from the European Union's comprehensive Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) and the stringent General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), India needs to enact similar laws tailored to its unique market conditions. To effectively manage the complexities of AI-driven markets, India must invest in building the capacity of its regulatory bodies and develop a forward-looking legal framework that anticipates and mitigates the risks associated with AIaaS. This paradigm shift towards regulatory changes is crucial to harness the benefits of AI while ensuring ethical practices and protecting market stability.

*****

Footnotes

1. Author is a student at School of Excellence in Law, Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, Chennai, India.

2. Hannah Wren, What is AI as a Service (AIaaS)? A beginner’s guide for 2024, Zendesk Blog, (Jun. 20, 2024, 8:23 AM) https://www.zendesk.com/in/blog/ai-as-a-service/ ↩

3. Hannah Wren, What is AI as a Service (AIaaS)? A beginner’s guide for 2024, Zendesk Blog, (Jun. 20, 2024, 8:23 AM) https://www.zendesk.com/in/blog/ai-as-a-service/ ↩

4. Alessio Azzutti, Wolf-George Ringe, H.Siegfried Stiehl, Machine Learning, Market Manipulation and Collusion on Capital Markets: Why the “Black Box” Matters, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2021, (Jun. 20, 2024, 8:23 AM) Machine Learning, Market Manipulation and Collusion on Capital Markets: Why the "Black Box" Matters by Alessio Azzutti, Wolf-Georg Ringe, H. Siegfried Stiehl :: SSRN ↩

5. Hannah Wren, What is AI as a Service (AIaaS)? A beginner’s guide for 2024, Zendesk Blog, (Jun. 20, 2024, 8:23 AM) https://www.zendesk.com/in/blog/ai-as-a-service/ ↩

6. Akash Takyar, AI in Market research: Use, Cases, Applications, Benefits, Implementations and Solutions, LeewayHertz, (Jun 24, 2024, 3:09 PM) https://www.leewayhertz.com/ai-in-market-research/#The-role-of-AI-in-market-research ↩

7. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Market Manipulation, Investor.gov, (Jun 24, 2024, 4:36 PM) https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/investing-basics/glossary/market-manipulation ↩

8. Hannah Wren, What is AI as a Service (AIaaS)? A beginner’s guide for 2024, Zendesk Blog, (Jun. 20, 2024, 8:23 AM) https://www.zendesk.com/in/blog/ai-as-a-service/ ↩

9. Alessio Azzutti, Wolf-George Ringe, H.Siegfried Stiehl, Machine Learning, Market Manipulation and Collusion on Capital Markets: Why the “Black Box” Matters, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2021, (Jun. 20, 2024, 8:23 AM) Machine Learning, Market Manipulation and Collusion on Capital Markets: Why the "Black Box" Matters by Alessio Azzutti, Wolf-Georg Ringe, H. Siegfried Stiehl :: SSRN ↩

10. Jennifer Cobe, Jatinder Singh, Artificial Intelligence as a Service: Legal responsibilities, Liabilities, and Policy Changes, Computer Law and Security Review, Vol. 42, Sep 2021 (Jun 26, 2024, 9:45 PM) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0267364921000467#:~:text=Moreover%2C%20the%20potential%20for%20misuse,scrutiny%20from%20regulators%20and%20policymakers. ↩

11. Market Value of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in marketing worldwide from 2020 to 2028 (in billion U.S. Dollars) Worldwide; The Insight Partners; Statista, 2020. ↩

12. Metamorphosis of Stock Market Analysis Using the Power of AI, SBI Securities, (Jun. 25, 2024 8:45 PM) https://www.sbisecurities.in/blog/power-of-ai-in-stock-market-analysis ↩

13. Alessio Azzutti, Wolf-George Ringe, H.Siegfried Stiehl, Machine Learning, Market Manipulation and Collusion on Capital Markets: Why the “Black Box” Matters, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2021, (Jun. 20, 2024, 8:23 AM) Machine Learning, Market Manipulation and Collusion on Capital Markets: Why the "Black Box" Matters by Alessio Azzutti, Wolf-Georg Ringe, H. Siegfried Stiehl :: SSRN ↩

14. University de Geneve, Two Artificial Intelligences Talk to Each Other, ScienceDaily, (Jun 29, 2024, 9:30 PM) https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/03/240318142438.htm#:~:text=A%20team%20has%20succeeded%20in,which%20in%20turn%20performed%20them. ↩

15. Alessio Azzutti, Wolf-George Ringe, H.Siegfried Stiehl, Machine Learning, Market Manipulation and Collusion on Capital Markets: Why the “Black Box” Matters, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2021, (Jun. 20, 2024, 8:23 AM) Machine Learning, Market Manipulation and Collusion on Capital Markets: Why the "Black Box" Matters by Alessio Azzutti, Wolf-Georg Ringe, H. Siegfried Stiehl :: SSRN ↩

16. Jasmina Arifovic, Xue-zhong He, Lijian Wei, Machine Learning and speed in High-Frequency Trading, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 139, June 2022, (Jun. 26, 2024 2:56 PM) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165188922001439 ↩

17. Katie Harbath, Collier Fernekes, History of the Cambridge Analytica Controversy, Bipartisan Policy Centre, (Jun. 27, 2024 4:47 PM) https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/cambridge-analytica-controversy/#:~:text=Cambridge%20Analytica%20claimed%20to%20be,fully%20shut%20down%20in%202015. ↩

18. Nicholas Confessore, Cambridge Analytica and Facebook: The Scandal and the Fallout So Far, The New York Times, (Jun. 20, 2024, 5:30 PM) https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-scandal-fallout.html ↩

19. Julianna Rizzo, Influence of AI Marketing on Costumer Experience: Personalization and Manipulation, Medium (Jun 28, 2024 6:39 PM) https://medium.com/@juliannafaithrizzo/influence-of-ai-marketing-on-customer-experience-personalization-and-manipulation-c3f72f417f31 ↩

20. Alessio Azzutti, Wolf-George Ringe, H.Siegfried Stiehl, Machine Learning, Market Manipulation and Collusion on Capital Markets: Why the “Black Box” Matters, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2021, (Jun. 20, 2024, 8:23 AM) Machine Learning, Market Manipulation and Collusion on Capital Markets: Why the "Black Box" Matters by Alessio Azzutti, Wolf-Georg Ringe, H. Siegfried Stiehl :: SSRN ↩

21. Jennifer Cobe, Jatinder Singh, Artificial Intelligence as a Service: Legal responsibilities, Liabilities, and Policy Changes, Computer Law and Security Review, Vol. 42, Sep 2021 (Jun 26, 2024, 9:45 PM) ↩

22. Jiya Goel, Artificial Intelligence in Stock Market: Concepts, Applications and Limitations, International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management, Vol.2, Issue 9, pp: 578-583, (Jun 29, 2024 9:07 PM) https://ijaem.net/issue_dcp/Artificial%20Intelligence%20in%20Stock%20Market:%20Concepts,%20Applications%20and%20Limitations.pdf ↩

23. Takanobu Mizuta, Can an AI perform market manipulation at its own discretion? – A Generic algorithm learns in an artificial market simulation, IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering and Economics, (Jun 17, 2024 6:28 PM) https://mizutatakanobu.com/2020CIFEra.pdf ↩

24. European Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), EUR-Lex, (Jun 29, 2024 9:53 AM) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0596 ↩

25. Risto Uuk, The EU needs to protect (more) against AI manipulation, Euractiv, (Jun 30, 2024 7:45 AM) https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/opinion/the-eu-needs-to-protect-more-against-ai-manipulation/ ↩

26. Alessio Azzutti, Wolf-George Ringe, H.Siegfried Stiehl, Machine Learning, Market Manipulation and Collusion on Capital Markets: Why the “Black Box” Matters, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2021, (Jun. 20, 2024, 8:23 AM) Machine Learning, Market Manipulation and Collusion on Capital Markets: Why the "Black Box" Matters by Alessio Azzutti, Wolf-Georg Ringe, H. Siegfried Stiehl :: SSRN ↩

27. Complete Guide to GDPR Compliance, GDPR.Eu, (June 30, 2024 8:25 AM) https://gdpr.eu/ ↩

28. David Weisenfeld, EU AI law is sweeping but compliance seen as straightforward, Legal Dive, (Jun 30, 2024 9:56 AM) https://www.legaldive.com/news/EU-AI-Act-compliance-artificial-intelligence-rules-mayer-brown-Seyfarth-Shaw-IAPP/710434/#:~:text=The%20EU%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Act,risks%20are%20allowed%20with%20limits. ↩

29. Abishek Dey & Melissa Cyrill, India’s Regulation of AI and Large Language Models, (Jun 24, 2024 8:56 AM) https://www.india-briefing.com/news/india-regulation-of-ai-and-large-language-models-31680.html/#:~:text=Presently%2C%20India%20lacks%20a%20dedicated%20regulation%20for%20AI%2C%20but%20instead,regulatory%20landscape%20for%20AI%20technology. ↩