Abstract

Corporate criminal liability refers to the legal concept that a corporation, as a legal entity, can be held criminally liable for actions committed by its employees, directors, or agents acting on its behalf. Traditionally, criminal law focused on individual culpability; however, with the evolution of business structures and increasing corporate influence, there has been a significant shift towards recognizing corporations as potential perpetrators of crime. This doctrine addresses the challenge of attributing mens rea (guilty mind) and actus reus (guilty act) to an artificial entity. Legal systems have adopted various models to enforce corporate liability, such as the identification doctrine, vicarious liability, and the aggregation theory. Through these mechanisms, courts have held corporations accountable for a wide range of offenses—from environmental violations and financial fraud to corruption and workplace safety breaches. The rationale behind corporate criminal liability is to ensure deterrence, promote corporate governance, and uphold ethical business practices. Yet, its implementation raises complex issues, such as penalizing shareholders for actions of individuals and distinguishing corporate fault from individual misconduct. Modern legal reforms in several jurisdictions have introduced compliance programs and deferred prosecution agreements to balance accountability with rehabilitative approaches. This article delves into the theoretical underpinnings, legal frameworks, and global perspectives on corporate criminal liability. It explores landmark cases, regulatory mechanisms, and recent trends, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of how the legal system is evolving to address corporate crime in an increasingly globalized economy.

Keywords