Home / Volume 6, Issue 3 / Decoding the Crypto Conundrum: Navigating the Legal Landscape… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 6 Issue 3 378 - 393 May 20, 2024

Decoding the Crypto Conundrum: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Taxing Cryptocurrency in India

Lead author · Corresponding
Jai Ganesh
Advocate at Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, India
Abstract

Cryptocurrency trading gained prominence in India during the COVID lockdown, with current transactions now reaching an impressive $250 billion, second only to the USA. Nevertheless, the government has yet to establish a comprehensive mechanism for taxing and maintaining regulatory oversight over cryptocurrency. Initially, the central government was enthusiastic about prohibiting cryptocurrency in 2021, going so far as to draft a bill for that purpose. However, the central government swiftly recognized the inadequacy of this idea. This realization, combined with the Supreme Court's annulment of the RBI circular banning cryptocurrency in March 2020, brought an end to the initiative. Moreover, on March 7, 2023, the Central government instituted a flat tax of 30% on cryptocurrency through the introduction of Section 115 BBH in the Income Tax Act, 1963. This action indirectly—though not officially—acknowledged cryptocurrency transactions in India. Consequently, the Income Tax Authority is now legally empowered to levy taxes on cryptocurrency. Nonetheless, the RBI governor, as of January 2023, emphatically asserted the imperative of banning cryptocurrency due to its perceived threat to the financial stability of the country. The government's exclusive focus on levying taxes on cryptocurrency, without considering the potential for individuals to incur losses and still be obligated to pay taxes, alongside restrictions on the carry forward of losses, has resulted in more complications than it ostensibly aims to resolve. The absence of clarification regarding whether cryptocurrency is classified as a security, income, asset, legal tender, etc., has led to a lack of SEBI oversight. Consequently, conflicting ideas and approaches on cryptocurrency persist among the government, RBI, SEBI, and IT department. Therefore, there arises a necessity to draw insights from countries where cryptocurrency transactions are widespread, comprehend their regulatory and tax frameworks, and formulate a bespoke approach for India to regulate and tax cryptocurrency.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation, Volume 6, Issue 3, Page 378 - 393
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLSI 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us