Abstract

The article provides an in-depth comparison of two major retirement savings options available to Indian employees: the Employee Provident Fund (EPF) and the National Pension Scheme (NPS). The article begins by explaining the foundational aspects of each scheme, including their objectives, eligibility criteria, and the mechanisms through which contributions are made. It outlines the benefits associated with EPF, such as mandatory contributions, government-backed security, and tax advantages, while also discussing the advantages of the NPS, including its flexibility in investment choices, potential for higher returns, and additional tax benefits. The comparison is further extended to cover the tax implications of both schemes, focusing on the tax deductions and exemptions under Sections 80C and 80CCD of the income tax act. The article highlights the differences in withdrawal rules, annuity options, and liquidity, which are crucial for retirement planning. Additionally, the article evaluates, these schemes from the perspective of various worker demographics, including salaried employees in the private and public sectors, self-employed individuals, and those with varying risk tolerances and retirement goals. In conclusion, the article provides a set of guidelines to help readers determine the most suitable option based on their individual circumstances, such as risk appetite, long-term financial goals, and the level of control they wish to have over their retirement corpus. The aim is to empower Indian workers with the knowledge required to make informed decisions about their retirement savings, ensuring financial security in their post-retirement years.

Keywords