Student at St. Joseph’s College of Law, Bengaluru, India
The present study explores the interdisciplinary application of Shannon’s entropy formula, originally developed for information theory, to assess the epistemological uncertainty termed as "legal entropy" in judicial processes. By mathematically conceptualizing the unpredictability and information loss associated with narco-analysis through Shannon’s entropy model, the research demonstrates that such evidence often increases epistemic instability rather than mitigating it. This framework provides a novel lens to evaluate scientific evidence in courts and urges a reassessment of how the Indian judiciary integrates such ambiguous inputs into legal reasoning.
Research Paper
International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation, Volume 7, Issue 3, Page 365 - 374
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLSI.112592
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © IJLSI 2021