Abstract

Environmental protection has emerged as a critical concern globally, with nations striving to balance development and ecological sustainability. In India, the Constitution enshrines environmental protection as both a directive for the State and a duty for its citizens. The 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 introduced Article 48A, directing the State to protect and improve the environment, and Article 51A(g), mandating citizens to safeguard the natural environment and exhibit compassion for living creatures. These provisions underscore the constitutional commitment to environmental conservation. Judicial interpretations have further reinforced this commitment. The Supreme Court, through landmark judgments, has expanded the scope of Article 21, recognizing the right to a clean and healthy environment as intrinsic to the right to life. Cases like M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar have set precedents in environmental jurisprudence, emphasizing the State's responsibility and citizens' role in environmental protection. Despite these constitutional mandates and judicial pronouncements, the ground reality presents challenges. Environmental degradation persists due to factors like industrial pollution, deforestation, and inadequate enforcement of environmental laws. Public awareness and participation, though growing, remain insufficient to effect significant change. This article delves into the constitutional provisions related to environmental protection, analyzes judicial interpretations, assesses the current environmental scenario in India, and explores the gap between constitutional ideals and practical implementation. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of environmental protection as a fundamental duty and the realities that influence its actualization.

Keywords